Page 1 of 1 [ 7 posts ] 

MaxE
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,295
Location: Mid-Atlantic US

23 Apr 2022, 5:29 pm

Disclaimer: I know nothing about this site so cannot vouch for its dedication to factual reporting.

Assange and Trump, Partners

Quote:
Following an extradition order issued yesterday by a British court, Julian Assange—founder of WikiLeaks and willing agent of Russian active measures—is one step closer to facing American justice.

Assange is just the latest Donald Trump satellite to face criminal charges, after Michael Cohen, Steve Bannon, Roger Stone, Paul Manafort, and others. The question cannot be avoided: What about the ringleader himself? It must be counted an irony of history that a sizable fraction of dyed-in-the-wool leftists, assisted by a few preposterous libertarians, who labored to turn Assange—and later Edward Snowden—into folk heroes during the Obama administration found themselves cheering Trump and lauding his “socialist” principles. It is fitting and proper that Assange answer for his crimes, but Trump presents a larger political problem that mere criminal justice cannot solve.

The Trump-Assange fringe has found its primary cause in the rejection of “American empire” and has been sympathetic to America’s enemies around the world. Bizarrely for a movement proclaiming fidelity to transparent government, it has greeted with enthusiasm and even active support Vladimir Putin’s hostility to free government, sabotage of democracy in the West, subversion of democracy in (and war on) Ukraine, and extinguishing of democracy in Russia. (Little wonder that ever since Snowden quit his country with his ill-gotten goods, he has enjoyed a welcome refuge in Putin’s Russia.)

Anti-communist crusaders like Richard Nixon used to accuse their political opponents of being “pink”—i.e., half “red,” or sympathetic to communism. It is remarkable that one of the most consequential allies of the anti-American reactionary left leads the American right. Before Trump’s ascendancy, the Republican party championed American global leadership. Now it’s an illiberal cult espousing the narrow nationalist themes of “America First.” Trump’s political movement remains committed to the ruination of America’s institutions and the retreat of its global influence. Under his sway, the Republican party views Joe Biden as a greater threat to the country than Putin’s Russia. Far from believing, as Republican presidents used to believe, that America was and ought to be a beacon of democracy in the world, Trump’s Republicans are intent on destroying democracy at home while admiring foreign scourges like Viktor Orbán.

The alliance between the reactionary left and the unhinged right has sought to corrupt the American republic and inhibit its power in the world. It should come as no surprise that the greatest opponents of American activism on the world stage are also the most corrosive to its internal politics: At its noblest, America’s foreign policy is based, however imperfectly, on the principles of freedom and democracy. Although not guided entirely by altruistic considerations, U.S. foreign policy is beyond comparison with the paranoid, vicious realpolitik that characterizes Russian or Chinese behavior in the world. It is the distinctly American internationalism, blending realism with idealism—coercion against despots and a basic concern for human rights—that leaves the new left and the old right out of sorts.

Both Assange and Trump—the two were practically teammates in 2016—are unburdened by any thoughtful consideration of the national interest and lack any moral constraints in the pursuit of their overriding objectives—the end of American hegemony and personal enrichment at the expense of the country, respectively. Assange faces charges as a dangerous foreign agent for attacking the republic from without as Trump subverted it from within.

Assange evidently aspires to live in a world without authority and in which no country (save, one imagines, his Russian benefactors) can act to protect its interests. The proper response to foreign agents who filch official secrets and interfere with elections is to arraign them for judgment before a court of law.

Trump, too, evidently aspires to live in a world without any authority but his own, or those of his role models: Putin, Xi, Kim, and his “favorite dictator,” Sisi. In this sense, Trump’s first impeachment—over withholding foreign aid to Ukraine in exchange for personal political favors—revealed the same deep-seated contempt for democracy that was on display in his second impeachment. The proper response to such anti-democratic politicians is for responsible parties and citizens to pass them over.

The cause of democracy and the rule of law will soon be offered two opportunities, one legal and the other political. In short order, Assange will find himself in an American courtroom, answering for his outrages. And voters will have another opportunity to reject Trump—or whoever is elevated by the anti-democratic faction ascendant on the right—at the voting booth.

In the realm of law and of politics, legitimate power finds itself under several forms of overt and covert attack. Its partisans dare not squander the opportunity to offer it a vigorous defense.


_________________
My WP story


VegetableMan
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,208
Location: Illinois

23 Apr 2022, 8:03 pm

It's BS. There is no evidence that proves any connection between Assange and Russia.


_________________
What do you call a hot dog in a gangster suit?

Oscar Meyer Lansky


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 46,005
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

24 Apr 2022, 2:55 am

VegetableMan wrote:
It's BS. There is no evidence that proves any connection between Assange and Russia.


No? Assange certainly had no problem dishing dirt at the US, but shied away from speaking out about everything from war crimes, to homophobic oppression, to suppression of the press in Russia. Makes one ask: why?


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


SpiceWolf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jun 2008
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 774

24 Apr 2022, 10:01 am

VegetableMan wrote:
It's BS. There is no evidence that proves any connection between Assange and Russia.


It's a scene setting excercise.

Since Assange is now being handed over by the British, the public have to be reminded to hate him and you can see how they appeal to emotion by linking him to domestic hate figures in that shrill bellicose tone that would impress a North Korean propaganda screecher.

They want to whip them into a bloodlust, so they stop thinking and don't ask awkward questions like
'Why is the USA prosecuting a journalist for telling the truth?'
'Don't we have a constitutional ammendment to stop this sort of thing?'
'Didn't the New York Times and Guardian also publish the documents? Why aren't THEY being tried?'

It's a part of the manufacturing of consent to the show trial of a journalist and publisher for the 'crime' of telling the people the truth about their government.



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 56,885
Location: Stendec

24 Apr 2022, 10:21 am

The Bulwark is an American anti-Trump neoconservative news and opinion website founded in 2018 by commentators Charlie Sykes and Bill Kristol. Its publisher is Sarah Longwell. While it launched as a news aggregator, it was revamped into a news and opinion site using key digital staffers from the defunct magazine The Weekly Standard.

Read the Full Article
HERE

As much as I despise both Trump and Assange, I find no irrefutable evidence that they colluded.



MaxE
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,295
Location: Mid-Atlantic US

24 Apr 2022, 1:29 pm

Fnord wrote:
As much as I despise both Trump and Assange, I find no irrefutable evidence that they colluded.

Did the disclaimer help? I honestly had no idea what that site was.


_________________
My WP story


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 56,885
Location: Stendec

25 Apr 2022, 8:23 am

MaxE wrote:
Fnord wrote:
As much as I despise both Trump and Assange, I find no irrefutable evidence that they colluded.
Did the disclaimer help? I honestly had no idea what that site was.
Actually, the disclaimer is what tipped me off and motivated me to check on the site's reputation.

:D