kraftiekortie wrote:
In general, I find that the aging process is becoming a slower process.
In the 1950's, people in their 40's, or even their 30's, looked much older than people in their 30's/40's do today.
I remember my father at 55. I'm 55 now. I look much younger than he did when he was 55. I act a lot less mature, too.
I believe, over the past generation, that "adolescence" has extended to approximately age 25. The end of adolescence tended to seem like somewhere between ages 18 and 21 during the previous generation.
My grandmother, when she was in her 50's, seemed like a so-called real grandmother. Not many people in their 50's, these days, seem like so-called real grandmothers/grandfathers.
Reading through a "coffee table book" called "My brother's face" of civil war era photos, one of the things that struck me was how old the 20-somethings looked. The hardness of the expressions was what I would expect someone in their 40's or 50's to have nowadays.
But the difference in the responsibilities one shouldered in that era and the responsibilities at the same age given to people now...no wonder. In the Laura Ingalls Wilder books, Laura referred to her father doing a full day's work in the field with the men at the age of 9 yrs old (Laura was born in 1867, so that would have been approx. the 1830's or '40's? Don't remember what year he was born). Now, our 9 yr olds are in 4th grade or so, and riding bikes and playing video games in their free time. Many have chores, but I don't know any parents, even among the plain Mennonites that I grew up with, who expect their 9 yr olds to do a man's work.
Our childhoods extend much longer than they did back then. No wonder people looked older, at younger ages, years ago.
_________________
"Them that don't know him don't like him,
and them that do sometimes don't know how to take him;
He ain't wrong, he's just different,
and his pride won't let him
do things to make you think he's right."
-Ed Bruce