naturalplastic wrote:
I will sidestep the issue of whether or not there should be a death penalty by saying...
IF
ANY one deserves the death penalty then...yes...he would be a person who would deserve it. He even earned a place on the express line IMHO.
Except maybe he is the kinda perp for whom death is the lesser punishment. Being incarcerated without the freedom to kill again for decades might be a jworse punishment for him. Ted Bundy actually moved to Florida BECAUSE it had the death penalty. No one is sure why, but apparently he knew his career couldnt continue forever- so he preferred that the authorities give him a quick end. Maybe. Who knows?
Modern death sentences in the US involve decades in prison prior to execution, if they are even ever executed as it is common for them to die of natural causes while on death row for decades. It basically is a life sentence in practice with the main differences being that they are in an extremely strict special housing unit during their stay and, most importantly, that there is a threat of the state legally killing them at some point. He is young enough and his crime horrific and famous enough though, that he would most likely be one of those exicuted and it would probably take considerably less time then most cases, especially since there is no question as to if he is guilty as there is in many other cases.
I don't believe that lethal injection is appropriate for executing people. They make it into some kind of twisted faux medical procedure in this strange effort to try and hide from what it is. I firmly believe that some people need to be put down, but it should be through methods like beheading, hanging, shooting, impaling, gibliting, flaying, boiling, etc..
I feel also that the punishment should somewhat mach the crime.